rest is all statics, that u are very good. Account is booked after the expense is done. and written in books as + or – ( they call Credit and Debit)

Finance if future predection of where to get money from and where to spend.

Only crux here is to under stand + and -. that is what to + or – and where.

Balance is projection of data in various formats of statics in cluding the balance sheet. I hope that is good

and in addition u get calculator do do all this.

They are different in the sense that they are unbreakable. They are also different in that they are non-interpretable (or singly-interpretable: there is only one interpretation that makes sense), and they strive to be conditional, where real laws strive to be unconditional. They were also discovered and not created: they are not arbitrary choices in and of themselves, but logical consequences of other arbitrary choices.

They are similar in the sense that they define relationships and restrict behavior: real laws of people, trig laws of triangles.

The idea of zero being a number itself was avoided for a long time, but one way that it came into practical use was in dealing with tax collecting. Having negative values to represent debt is not so easy to calculate unless you have a 0, so you can apply the same math of addition and subtraction.

A really great book on the subject is Charles Seife’s “Zero: the Biography of a Dangerous Idea.”

Finally in the 1960s the device was invented to witness matter at the atomic scale. They found that many molecules were this exact size, around 35 nanometres.

Some people have a way with numbers a computer cannot replicate. The example is the various people who can tell within seconds if a particular number is a prime number. There is no non-exhaustive calculation for this function.

The mind is not a machine- so it is naive to think these rare cognitive phenomena can be reproduced computationally.

Just imagine regular calculus in 4 dimensions simultaneously.

Then add in Laplace transforms, Fourier transforms, etc.

Don’t forget statistics and probability – for failure rate, quality control, etc.

Not True!!

eletronic machines are very small part of CS…..

2)In mathematics, beauty is often linked with simplicity and simplicity to truth. The aestethic component of mathematics is a strong inner driving force for research.
There is beauty that can be found in definitions, theorems, proofs( Gian-Carlo Rota).
A proof is beautiful when it gives away the secret of the theorem, when it leads us to perceive the actual and not the logical inevability of the statement that is proved.
Beauty does not admit degrees of comparison. For example: to state that the prime number theorem is more beautiful than Picard’s theorem would be nonsensical. The perception of beauty doesn’t come in a flash. The appreciation of mathematical beauty requires thorough familiarity with mathematics, and such familiarity is arrived at the cost of time, effort, exercise.
As a consequence, the beauty that the educated people finds in mathematics-if, indeed, it finds beauty at all- is different from the beauth that professional mathematicians find.
What is useful mathematically is not necessaarily beautiful. In numerical methods, the best codes are often long, complex, and company confidential.

3) Returning to the necessary long experience that limits the general perception of mathematical beauty, Rota believes that teachers’attempts to arouse interest in mathematics on the basis of beauty are bound to fail.”

270 Mangosteen are shared, and all three of them (hal, roi and wong) get the same number of mangosteen.

So, all three of them get 90 each (270/3 = 90)
Now, hal gets 10% more than mangosteen than roi.. so, 10% of 90 is 9. 90+9 = 99

So, hal gets 99 mangosteen. I feel its right, but i’m not sure. Since they say they got the same number, and still hal gets 10% more.. duh?

you won’t get an integral ans

if the total # had been 279,

the distribution could have been 90,90 & 99

with a total of 270, the ans comes as

95.8064516 !!!!!

12 in base12 = 1 X 12^1 + 2 X 12^0 (base 10)
= 1 X 12 + 2 X 1 (base 10)
= 12 + 2 (base 10)
12 (base 12) = 14 (base 10)

NOTE: 12^1 = 12
12^0 = 1 (any number raised to the zero power equals 1)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
7 + 7 = 14

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
7+7 = 12
2 times the 6th number = the 12th number

roman numerals can be very useful in situtations(they are used in superbowlsand other places

I=1
V=5
X=10
L=50
C=100
D=500
M=1000
bythe way the littles is come together to make big ones and v